My
name is Rachel and I am a Christian and I am a non denominational
Christian. When I was 17 I attended a church and was told about a gift
I would be given. I was told that I would be given one of the gifts
of the Holy Spirit. In the Bible, (1 Corinthians :12) lists the
gifts of the Holy Spirit and prophecy is one of the gifts of the Holy
Spirit
which I was given by God. For me this is mainly focused around being a
seer, visioner predominantly. This article touches on also on my journey
as a Christian spanning over more
than three decades. I also give my brief take on what healing and
miracles mean to me today as someone who experiences disability, but
who is not defined by it. We all have our unique journeys to share and now I will share mine with you.
How it Began
Let
me tell you some background on how this happened. When I was 16 I was
approached
at a fashion event, the Clothes Show Live and was told I had the
potential to become
a successful model if I was to grow a few inches. I desperately wanted
this to
happen and soon enough I started praying asking to grow taller. I was
asking for a miracle in other words. I spent months at 16 praying to God
for my miracle. At 17 in around 1990 in
London a friend of my mum’s told her about a church and I decided to tag
along
for my desperate plea to grow to become a model to be answered. I
received a
response at that time, but not in ways I could have ever imagined or had
any knowledge of. I was told by a pastoral leader; a prophetess in the
church, that I
was going to be given the gift of prophecy. The leader of the church was
a
devout figure who humbly served the Lord. I was told that this would be
done as things would be difficult for me and it would also act as a form
of
protection in my life. I was also encouraged to attend church as it
would be
helpful for me. I was told I should go home and pray, drink holy water
and follow a further scriptural step and soon after I would start to
see things around me and to
expect it and to note this down. Soon enough though, this happened to me
what I was told would when I went home.
As
I
noted in my book at the time, a bolt that was yellow came into my room
and the
room was swimming in colours and had the presence of flowers. I wrote in
my book at that time that in my bedroom things are flying around, red,
orange, yellow white like dynamite. I have included this extract from my
book
which I will read out to you at the end of this testimony in a video.
This didn’t faze me in any way. This lasted
for a few days which I was so obviously seeing which then left my eyes
open to a brighter more colourful gaze of the world with a small amount
of illumination on the world. This is a manifestation of God's power and
light.
I
am diagnosed with Autism
Spectrum Disorder (ASD). I was diagnosed with this later in life. This
however affected me from childhood. I have experienced hypersensitivity
from my childhood. The first two years of my life I faced ill health
and I had a hospital admission for an infection at two months old. In
my early infancy I also spent time living with nannies who failed
to give me any social interaction. These two experiences may have
impacted on the development of my autism. I was educated in
Catholic schools and baptised, but my parents were Christians. Growing
up we didn't very often attend church, but as a family we quite
routinely gathered
around at night to say prayers. I also enjoyed studying religion for my
GCSE's at school and wanted to study it at A levels but it wasn't
available. My interest in Christianity really peaked at
16, when I sought out my miracle.
I will also show you a modelling book in a video that I have with my dreams to grow taller all contained in
it at the end of this testimony. That didn’t happen, I didn't make the height.
The church we attended was a Christian Charismatic church and this was a new experience
for me. I didn’t know anything about it. I went on to be able to give accurate closed eye and open eye visions
in the church.
An open eye vision I had at the church it showered over a couple's head
with showers of Blessings (Ezekeil 34:26) who were looking for childbirth and the leader said they would be
blessed by a child. I have witnessed with closed eyes water being
spiritually blessed as well to be made Holy. All praises be to God.
During
my time
attending this church I did observe one miracle as well. A very young
boy who
was not able to walk was able to do so after several visits to the
church. A
woman of Jamaican origin attended the church in a different language
speaking
church. She was there for one purpose, which was to serve her faith. The
Holy Spirit was alive in that church. I didn’t spend very long attending
that
church with my mum. I didn’t ask questions at 17, it was a different
world with no internet but I can give testimony to how it has
worked in my life. This is my personal witness.
The Journey
Today
I
am non denominational. With inclusion, there should be a place at church
for us whatever church we may end up at. God loves us all and
we are all uniquely made with purpose and precious in God's sight. I
have observed believers who have unshakeable faith through all
trials and tribulations and recognise the power of God in their lives as
well.
My
gift of prophecy is visible to me, although I'm not using it to serve
in church at this point in my life. This started another journey with
God. I was alone in the house. But obviously to me I was not alone. For I
had company, the gift of prophecy. I knew something was there in the
background. My dad has said to me several years ago that so many people
would have gone mad, just staying in the house. I felt like I was not
alone though with the light manifestation being present. For I had a
secret friend that kept me going daily and I could see it. My gift has
served as a major comfort to me throughout my life knowing and seeing it
was there. I knew at times when I was desperate and alone that I wasn’t
totally alone in this world. I had too visible knowledge that there was
something beyond this which can be calming and can give me more courage
to continue daily. I feel that God has upheld me in my life by his free
spirit that Psalm 51 gives mentions to.
Any
further visions I have had post 17 I won't share them in this testimony
although they have given me comfort, and I am here to edify the church
and those visions I have shared have been verified in church.
My faith carries me today. As Christians it is important that we do
pray I've realised through life so that we will
continue to be fully protected and to support us get through the day.
Sometimes in life though it may be difficult to
communicate with God, a simple Our Father can be a starting point which
can be
found in (Matthew 6:9-13). Jesus showed us how we can pray with this
prayer.
Sometimes it has been hard for me to
pray due to my health and people prayed for me. Intercessory prayer is
very
important during these times for others.
Why
am I sharing this with you today? This will be for many at 49 years old
the first time that they will know this about me when they see this.
We often say little about these things, but sometimes we may feel called
to speak out. I feel that it is the time to empty my pockets and share
what I have witnessed as a Christian to support others and to offer
this as a small gift to my Father. This has also been a very difficult
time in the world and we are still experiencing unsettlement in the
world. People need to be restored now more than ever and need support.
People need to be armoured as well, as much as they can (Ephesians
6:11). With
my natural light heartedness I would say think of the Teenage Turtles
getting themselves ready. Let us remember that Jesus left for us a comforter to console us in times of distress (John 14:26).
Returning to this, many people cannot see beyond a 9-5 and many
struggle to see a purpose to continue and it is not hard to become
caught up in the world. At this point I felt sadness.
This
is the will of God in my life. The world as I experience it I
constantly see that there is a world beyond this one with my eyes, that
God is just but there, which simply means there is something beyond this
world which awaits me and us. Still, It is not rainbows for me as well,
life can be challenging and I would find life even more challenging
without being supported as well. Being a Christian is not always easy,
but God knows how to uniquely support his children. It would be good
here to remember that we are all equal in the sight of God, for there is
no Jew or Greek, slave or free slave, male and neither female before
God (Galatians 3: 28).
Moving
on, I have loved God with my whole heart (and this is the most
important commandment) since I was 17 and I haven’t been at times
perfect, who is, though I strive to do better. Loving God Our Father is
the most important thing. Perfection
will only be found in God which Jesus is our perfect example of and
who we should keep our focus on and emulate. God has been a tender
hearted, patient and merciful God to me. God shows himself in different
faces (Psalm 18:26). I believe in establishing a relationship with God
and communicating with God openly in prayer can help. Communicating with
God makes any situation more bearable for me. It is this personal
relationship and love of God that will help to sustain your faith.
God
really does love us. But we have to make an effort to show him how much we love him and we
will be rewarded. I've never felt so loved. There are no humans that can love the way God loves.
I
think the Beatitudes given by Jesus Christ
should frame how Christians behave and this should be reflected onto
others. Among the 8 Beatitudes in (Matthew 5:3-12) we are told that
Blessed
are the meek, what can we take away from this about how we should
conduct
ourselves with others? We can take away from this that we should be
gentle and not present ourselves among others in a bashful proud manner.
We are also told that Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain
mercy. What
does being merciful mean? It means that in day to day interactions that
we should strive to be forgiving and that we shouldn't judge others but
that
we should be compassionate towards our fellow neighbour and not act
as a persecutor who is vitriolic about their damnation which may cause
people
to lose hope, so that God will have mercy on you when the time for your
judgement comes. God is our ultimate judge (James 4:11). " Anyone who
speaks against a brother or sister or judges them speaks against the
law."Don't let anyone make you lose your faith. It is with a clean heart that you will see God that the
Beatitudes tell us.
I
believe that Jesus is my saviour and my salvation which is rendered to
me by Jesus Christ who atoned for our sins. I believe that I serve one
God. However,
my compassion for humanity extends to the world and I want all people irrespective of their background
or religion to be treated with compassion and dignity. There are some
challenges of modern life and I worry about the very young and social media
influences, such as we have seen with various cases in the media. We should do
our best to take care of them to ensure their safety online.
Church Life
It
has at
times been very challenging for me to attend church. It has been
difficult at times due to my eating disorder when I have been too unwell
to attend.
I was diagnosed with Anorexia Nervosa at 21 and at times have also
needed long term treatment in
inpatient. Eating disorder behaviour started at 14 after several very
difficult experiences caused by sin in the world and the involvement of
the role of my own personality. I have however experienced a long term
eating disorder. Today I am diagnosed with anorexia and have medical
complications which I receive treatment for under the National Health
Service (NHS). In
my life, God reached down low to me and started walking with me,
through my own mental health wilderness and my exile from much of
society because of my mental health condition and autism. All grace be
to God. Jesus also stressed the need for medical attention which
today people often get at the point of persistent symptoms (Matthew 9:12).
Today
we have Christian online services and groups which may be something
that people can consider who cannot attend a physical church in person.
I
now attend a Holy Communion Eucharist service in my local area. The
service I attend is a quiet early morning service. The service I attend
is manageable for me in terms of length. I
have always come away with an uplifting feeling and a spring in my
step after attending church. Going to church helps to sustain me and I
like to know that I am doing what I can to manage my life the best way
that I can. I also enjoy the routine of going to church as well.
Attending a sacred place as well gives me further sanctuary from the
world which can be challenging at times. I like the sense also of an
ending and newness to the week ahead that going to church can give me as
well.
I
feel also more connected to my faith through attending
church and taking the blessed Eucharist helps me with this feeling of
being more connected with Christ. Jesus told us to do this in his
memory (Matthew 26: 26-29). For your own reasons you can also receive a
Blessing in a church instead of the Eucharist.
I
have found my church leaders to be an invaluable source of support to
me spiritually and psychologically. In our gatherings as Christians also we can support each other (Hebrews 10:25). "Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together,
as the manner of
some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the
day approaching." So yes, there is indeed that Body of Christ composed
of Christ as the head and the members of the church to form one body and
there is clearly also a meeting point where we gather together to
worship.
I am also mindful on Sunday of the
Sabbath which I choose to mark at church and worship God. Jesus would attend the
synagogue on the Sabbath to worship his Father as was custom (Luke
4:16-21).
To
make this clear, yes, I have experienced difficulties as an autistic in
a different church with a different style of worship. The service I
attended I must say was extremely good, but it was just not suited to
my needs as an autistic Christian. The service I attend today is more
suited to my needs as an individual who has autism also. I can say some
of the difficulties; I have had in the past at church was that length of
the service was not at a length I could retain focus and there was more
movement of
sitting to standing and this is a known issue that some autistics
experience, but that was overcome for me when I went to a new
church with a shorter service and less sitting to standing.
We
can go between different churches to settle at the right church for us
and I have found the right place for me. I have been at my current
church for around three years now and have settled at the right church
for me. I have further needs in communication and imagination and if in
any doubt I discuss things through with my church leadership and others
using their gifts and the situation is understood. I can struggle with
someone's pacing of their speech due to autism but listen and expand on
the sermon privately at home after service. The service I attend is a
silent service and I can struggle with an organ or very loud music. I do
have my own playlist of Christian music and listen to when I feel drawn
to do so. God has simply equipped me to cope which has circumvented my
weaknesses and shone a light into what strengths which he only has given
to me to sustain me through my journey and that is what I must focus
and expand on. I have found ways to manage my difficulties sufficiently.
The Church Body and the Gifts of the Holy Spirit
(1 Corinthians 12 27-28)-"Now ye are the Body of Christ, and members in particular and God have first set some in the church, first apostles."
The
Church Body are members of the church and Jesus is also the head of the
Church (Ephesians 1:22-23). As baptised Christians we become part of
that body of Christ and have a purpose to fulfil in the church (1
Corinthians 12-28) (Romans 12). When we take the Eucharist we are being
unified with Christ. Jesus is the vine/stem and I am dependent on him
for my life.
The
Holy Spirit has the potential to be active in any church that worships
God in truth and Spirit through the Gifts of the Holy Spirit for example
such as the gift of healing, truth and wisdom and can also come in
presence. The Holy Spirit Paraclete is the breath, wind, spirit of God,
which I have felt at church.
Each spiritual gift given to members of the Body of Christ works in
harmony and has intrinsic value.
There
are 7 gifts of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians :12) in the Bible and the
Gift of the Holy Spirit is usually received today at church through the
laying on of hands or baptism. "Paul had laid his hands upon them and
the Holy Ghost came upon them (Acts 19-6) (1 Timothy 4:14). The Bible
closely links Baptism to the giving of the Holy Spirit (Luke 3:16).
Baptism goes far beyond the receiving of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit to
renewing promises which marks the beginning of a new journey with God.
The
Holy Spirit has many roles, helper, protector, intercessor, advocate,
strengthener, standby, comforter, counsellor, baptiser and a
sanctifier.
We
are born with our spirit which also contains the Spirit of God (Psalm
104-30) "Thy sendest forth thy spirit, they are created." Being Baptised
with more of the Holy Spirit at Baptism (which Jesus laid the way for)
allows one to grow in the Spirit and become more fully ourselves
emulating the attributes of God. This is the presence of God with us
here and now and is a third attribute of God. Jesus requests us to be born of Spirit as Christians (John 3:5), Jesus stated that, "Truly, truly, I tell you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.”
I will now end this section with the below.
Your body is a
Temple of the Holy Spirit which appears in the Bible-(1 Corinthians 6).
Christians
post Baptism are reminded to keep their Temples clean, not just at
church but in the whole of their lives as a living duty service to God.
No, we will not get it right always as Christians and we look for
forgiveness and mercy from God as well. We need to remain focused on
Jesus and let us remember that the Gifts of the Holy Spirit is God's
power at work and not an indication of individual's achievement but as
such is required for their unique walk with their faith (Psalm
62)-"Power belongs to you God and with you God is unfailing love. Who
has saved us, and called us with a holy calling, not according to our
works, but according to his own purpose and grace (1 Timothy-9).
Miracles and Healing today
Moving
on, I have had my questions. I have settled on that this has been my
destiny and the people who I have encountered in my life have been part
of my destination journey as well. There are clearly many occasions that
Jesus healed people and carried out miracles on those with diverse
presentations and duration of illness to show that he was the Son of
God. Also, not all these people had sinned like with the man who was
born blind who received his sight after 38 years.
However,
Paul the Apostle had the ability to heal others but Jesus didn't heal
him from his condition. Jesus said that his grace was sufficient for
Paul and that God's power was to be magnified through his weakness and
that God would shine a light into his conditions to magnify his name to
let people know that God is with us and is just ( 2 Corinthians 12:7–9).
Paul was graced with the gift of prophecy. Paul told his companion
Timothy, who was also a pastor, to manage his condition and frequent
illnesses with a little bit of wine (1 Timothy 5:23). There is some
discussion of whether Jesus' friend Nicodemus was autistic.
We
know in the book of Genesis that suffering came into this world
(Genesis 6:3). At 17 I was blessed by God and God provided for me with a
spiritual gift even though I had autism and an eating disorder and it
was used at that time to serve the church with both conditions present.
God centrally as a responsible Father had more important things to be
concerned over in my life. This also has not limited change from being
made in my life. It has also been used to help
sustain, protect and walk with me.
I
scored moderate level 2 for sensory sensitivity on the autism test. I
am very visual and auditory sensitive and it is like light has
been brought to these areas how my gift of the Holy Spirit has worked.
My gift is loved by me as an autistic also with the light element that
comes with it. Also, some research called Sensory supernatural
experiences in autism by Ingela Visuri in 2018 found increased
somasensory experiences in autistic people. Autistic people are often
graced with spiritual gifts as documented by Keri Szabolcs in their
article titled Autism and Religion in 2023.
Too
many
Christians who experience issues with their physical health or have
disorders and those who are disabled are expected to confess their sins
in order
to be healed or delivered. Job called his friends who did this miserable
comforters (Job 16:2). A
Christian who has challenges with their health can also be assumed by
some Christians to be lacking in faith because they have not been
healed, which can feel like a judgement that can alienate some people
from practising their faith and can cause confusion for some people
about where they are with their faith.
Sometimes
people do not always wish for their condition to be the subject of
discussion when they go somewhere or they may need space from being
subject to attempts at being healed by others even if they may have the
best of intentions. Galatians 6:2 speaks to us also about the need to
support fellow Christians. Sometimes, it may be useful also to ask
directions about what someone might find useful and consider practical
support if a close contact also. Let's remember to love our neighbour as
ourselves as Jesus said was the second greatest commandment.
God answers prayers according to his will (1 John 5:14).
St Teresa of Avila is just but one of many saints who
experienced health challenges whilst serving God. Saint John of God and
Blessed Marcel Callo also endured mental health challenges whilst
serving God. Blessed Marcel Callo battled with depression whilst serving
God in Holiness. In Pia Matthew's book God's
Wildflowers documents 141 Saints, Blessed and Venerable, who
experienced health challenges ranging from
mental to physical pain whilst serving God in holiness. As the author
states in this book. Illness doesn't prove holiness and neither destroys
or causes holiness. Furthermore, although illness may make things
challenging at times, illness doesn't cause these Saints, Blessed and
Venerable, to be abandoned by God.
For
one boy with Epilepsy/Seizures before medication was used to treat this
condition in the New Testament the cure for this condition was prayer
and fasting to drive out the spirit (Matthew 17:21). A Blessed called
Amadeus IX of Savoy suffered from epilepsy and God blessed them and gave
them grace. As would be expected they also followed the prescriptive
steps in the New Testament to cure this condition. They
lived with this condition and miracles have been attributed to them.
This shows how different two people's paths can be who suffer from the
same condition. One person may be called to follow a path of healing
and one may be called to serve God and live with their condition with
God's blessing and grace and this will be God's will. This will also
apply to some other conditions.
As
a non denominational Christian I note that my Christian Catholic
brothers and sisters have a rich tradition in seeing the beauty in
creation and not despising the human body and knowing it is a temporary
state. They appear to be richly rewarded with many notable disabled Holy
human beings who dealt with adversity in the body but were Servants of
God.
Today
not all Christians who endure chronic issues with their physical health
and those who have disorders or who are disabled wish to receive a
miracle or be healed, some wish to be managed and some see their
condition as natural, especially with the ageing process.
Some
disabled Christians arrive at and describe a point of becoming
spiritually whole albeit not completely physically healed in the body.
Healing and Wholeness church services are good to explore to develop
this. For some, who are disabled
or have disorders see it as part of their identity and trust in the
Lord. We are all made in the image of God. Furthermore, there are people
with chronic issues with their health, disorders or disabilities today
who can exist more comfortably in some countries and
not find themselves excluded from society compared to the time of Jesus' ministry, I
would say to those who experience conditions that you are entitled to
have
your own faith and walk your own path as a Christian and remember that
God is with you as well. As Christians we should build each other up
and encourage each other as said so clearly in (1 Thessalonians 5:11).
Miracles
and healing are still happening today. God's power should not be
underestimated. If God desires for a miracle to occur or somebody to be
healed then it will happen in God's own timing. I
have witnessed miracles in others. The elders in church were instructed
to pray over and anoint those who were sick and unwell with oil and if
they had sinned they would be forgiven (James
5-14-15). There is a difference here between being unwell and in a
managed condition. They also used the laying of hands (Luke 13:13). I
have by my request been
prayed over and anointed with Holy oil at church and received the laying
of hands and
found it helpful in managing my autism, which is what I was asking for.
God knows also how to manage my autism.
Also,
after taking the Eucharist and asking Jesus to heal one of my
conditions experienced dramatic changes to that condition directly
after. My very noisy nervous system was muted and became more
manageable. There have been miracles recorded after taking this
sacrament. Sometimes God also chooses to heal someone when they do not
even ask as well as has occurred at Lourdes for example.
I
have also had water blessed to make it Holy at the church I attend
after service, which I used for spiritual refreshment (John 7: 37-39) to
defend myself and to sanctify my home. I am thankful for the mercy that Jesus has shown me as my saviour throughout my life.
My
ASD diagnosis has helped me to be more understanding of myself with
becoming overwhelmed especially. I know that God can help me to manage
my autism with being overwhelmed especially and understand my autism.
I experience hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity. In
the UK autism is seen as a neurodevelopmental disorder which is
regarded as a disability under the 2010 Equality Act and Autism Act
2009. On a gradient of 1-3 on the ADOS 2 test for autism I scored 1-2's
(mild-moderate). I also am moderate for conversation, communication and
sensory (as already noted). My autism is not at the highest point of
severity level 3.
I am managing anorexia now after extensive treatment but who knows what my future may
bring and what plans God may have for me. I
have read of reported cases like with Sister Marie Therese who have
been healed from her anorexia after five decades with anorexia. Her trauma stemmed from childhood abuse.
There
also have been Saints who have endured feeding issues in their lifetime
and who also were Servants of God. There have been some significant
changes for me over the years with growth and reducing the
aggressiveness of my eating disorder behaviour and I have survived at
times when I was not expected to. On some occasions they have been
thought to be Divine in Intervention, for reasons only known to God. It
was clearly not my time. However, this is not about my complete life
story. We all have our own paths and mine is for God to determine. I try
to take life daily and trust in God, trusting that Sovereign God's will be fulfilled in my life.
I am now looking forward to commence being a hospital chaplain
volunteer which has been a dream voluntary occupation I have wanted to
do for some years now.
Final note
We
should hope and pray for God's plans to be
manifested and fulfilled in our lives whatever our situation or
condition. We can continue to serve God in Spirit. What also gives me
comfort with my faith, is that I serve a steadfast God in a world that
can
accelerate with constant changes.
Let
us remind ourselves that the prophet Joel wrote that the gifts of the
Holy Spirit will be further poured out on the earth again (Acts 2 16-21)
and will continue until the Perfect one returns, which is Jesus.
Churches are resurging in the gifts of the Holy Spirit now. I think that
Jesus gave me this testimony at 17. Jesus knew as a child as well that I
just loved to write factually and record things as well.
My faith has ended up being the best gift that I could ever have received in
this world and I couldn't have managed without it. I feel that I have
had an unseen friend who is on my side in this from the start when God
blessed me with my gifts at 17.
If
you want to know more about the faith I suggest that you start out by
buying a Bible and then start out by reading the New Testament and then
the Old Testament. If you cannot buy a Bible you can download an online
Bible online and I suggest a website like Faith Comes by Hearing to
download it. Following this, I would suggest you start to communicate
with God in prayer.
May
God's plans be fulfilled in your life and God is always watching.I
encourage you to seek and knock the door as Jesus said in the Gospels
and the door
will be answered to you in time (Matthew 7:7-9). Surrender all to
Jesus. Hold on. I wish you
all well in your journeys. Do your best to commit and stay on the narrow
path the way that leads to Heaven through Christ Jesus.
Rachel Obanubi
Below
is a video with a description from my book with my experiences that
happened to me during that period in church at 17 at home that I
mentioned at the beginning of my testimony.
A video to highlight this testimony-it was filmed at my church
Filmed In Church-Loving God with my whole heart, a prayer giving thanks to God for my comforter-The Holy Spirit.
A video of me when unwell with anorexia in hospital in 2016-2017
My Autism Scores for Sensory/Hypersensitivity
You can download an Ebook Version of this testimony here below-
In Christianity Jesus and God were at heart against violence and they were proportional
in use of its application. God’s views are clearly reflected in Psalm 11
"The Lord examines the righteous, but the wicked, those who love violence,
he hates with a passion." The Church of England in the UK now works on a
model called the five marks of mission. One of the church’s mission is to seek
to transform unjust structures of society to challenge violence of every kind
and to peruse peace and reconciliation.
With me and my personality I find that my faith's justice principles has given me
more zeal to fight against injustice when I sometimes see it.
I will discuss how conflict resolution can be applied to ameliorate modern
day destructive conflict in society. In many parts of the world today,
especially in developing countries, religion is still an integral part to the
lives of many. Religion can be used constructively or destructively and it is
the destructive use of religion that often makes headline news whereas the
constructive use of religion receives little or no attention.
In this article I will centre on the constructive use of religion faith based
conflict resolution which is a form of track 2 diplomacy in application. In
this article I will argue that religion can be used constructively to
contribute towards resolving conflicts. Therefore religion can be utilised as a
force for peace in the international arena.
Faith-based actors have had an impact on the South African Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and contributed to rebooting South Africa with
a new moral consciousness. The Catholic lay international (NGO) Sant' Egidio
has helped to play a part in the signing of the Guatemalan peace accords. Faith
based actors have also played a part in the peace negotiations in Northern
Ireland and I will briefly discuss in this article how this happened. I will
also briefly discuss other conflicts that religion has contributed in
resolving.
The constructive use of religion has clear implications for conflict
resolution. We need to learn how to apply conflict resolution skills and tools in
our management of dispute mediation.
I hope some of you enjoy reading it and learning how religion can be used
constructively to resolve conflicts.
Introduction
The re-emergence of religion as a political actor in international relations
has not gone without tension. Eminent social scientists, such as Max Weber and
Auguste Comte, predicted the demise of religion as societies advanced. Instead,
in International relations, what we have been witnessing since the 1979 Iranian
Revolution is the steady re-emergence of religion as a political actor.
Faith-based actors orientate their peace-building and conflict resolution
around the values of their faith and their faith shapes their outlook. They can
mediate in conflicts that may be termed religious or have a religious component
which does not limit their peace building to conflicts surrounding religion.
Secular individuals can also be trained in peace building in religious disputes
and peace building initiatives.
Faith based dispute management can be initiated by individual actors or
institutions/organisations and by inter-religious councils.
I argue in this article that whilst it cannot be reasonably denied that
religion can be used destructively. Faith based conflict resolution, which is a
form of track 2 diplomacy or is now sometimes referred to as track 7 diplomacy
can also contribute towards resolving conflicts.
This ability of religion to be used constructively or destructively is the dual
nature of religion and what is at the heart of Scott Appleby’s terminology the
‘Ambivalence of the Sacred' (Appleby 2000). Faith based conflict resolution
offers the potential for rich resources of peace-building that are often
missed. The constructive use of religion has clear implications for domestic
and international relations.
What
we have been witnessing since the end of the Cold War is the destabilisation it
left behind.
The legacy of imperialism and colonialism in many parts of the world is also
still being felt today. We are also witnessing a reaction against Western
supremacy and ideologies in some parts of the world.
Track 1 diplomacy hard power has essentially proved ineffective on its own in
managing emerging conflicts. The UN was late to recognise this and this will be discussed further.
Megan Shore makes the case that, if religion is part of the problem then it
needs to also be part of the solution (Shore 2009:3). What we have been
witnessing are new ways of exploration and rejection, and in some countries
this has surfaced through religion, I will explore this further on.
Religion is for many people a strong component of identity, values and norms
and therefore, may help determine peoples’ moral compass and what they are
willing or not willing to do. This is crucial to take into account within the
realms of conflict resolution.
What I aim to demonstrate in this article is the latent potential of faith
based conflict resolution and what I present is just the tip of the iceberg but
my case studies should be able to provide useful insights for other cases. I
concentrate on religions of the Abrahamic faith tradition, but more so
Christianity in this article but all religions have the potential to be used
constructively. Religious peace builders guided by the underlying principles of
their faith can also attempt to get disputants to tap into the positive
conflict resolution tools that can be found within their own sacred texts. Identity Politics
Religion continues to be an important part of many individual’s lives around
the world. The latter part of the 20th century gave rise to a resurgence of
religion in many countries such as, the United States, South Africa, Nigeria
and China (Moghadam 2003:20-39). This resurgence was the most profound in
Russia and the Slavic Republics - what was repressed under Communism was now
resurfacing.
There are different parts that make up an individual's identity for example:
religion, ethnicity and gender are just a few. Identities are fluid and some
people's religious identity will be more pronounced than others. To some people
their faith is central and underpins all that they do. Religion can give people
motivation and shape peoples’ world-views and impact on how they live their
lives and be their modus operandi. Religion can impact on how people interpret
reality.
Religion can help define an individual’s value system and give them rules to
live by and norms. Norms reflect patterned behaviour which Andrew Hurrell
argues gives rise to normative expectations about what ought to be done
(Carlsnaes,Thomas, Simmons 2002: 143).
Some individual's will build a sense of shared community around their place of
worship. This can help to solidify their religious identity and therefore their
dependence on their place of worship and their religious leaders. In some
traditional communities the church or their place of worship may be the bedrock
of their community.
If a conflict involves two groups from different faiths and ethnicities, then
the conflict is termed as ethnoreligious. Individual's can fight to protect
their ethnicity and religion when they feel either is under threat which can
make these conflicts more intractable and protracted.
If a conflict involves a strong religious element then religion will need to be
taken account in this conflict and faith based actors will need to play a role
in building sustainable peace and I will explore this more in my next chapter
on conflict transformation.
Jonathon Fox conducted a study into domestic conflicts in the post cold war era and the role religious violence played in these conflicts (Goldewijk 2007:129) He used data from the Minorities at Risk Report, State Failure Dataset and the Religion and State Dataset (RAS). He identified eight trends concerning domestic conflicts. The second trend that he identified was that religion is rarely the cause of conflicts and is only the primary cause of conflicts in a minority of cases (ibid 2007:129). This trend leans closely to the instrumentalist argument. Instrumentalists argue that religion is not in most cases the root cause of conflicts. They argue that the root cause of conflicts emanates from social, economic and political causes. In order to ameroliate so-called religious conflicts it would mean tackling the root cause of conflicts.
The media, I argue, fuel this misrepresentation of conflicts. I do not downplay the way that ethnoreligious conflicts can function but continually not giving any debate to the other issues involved serves to confirm that religion again is the main source of conflicts and presents a distorted picture. It can also detract attention from socio-economic problems that need to be addressed. Fox’s seventh trend also identified that religion can be used as source of peace and as a potential tool for conflict resolution (ibid 2007:129)
Susanna Pearce also conducted a study in 2005, involving territorial conflicts between 1946 and 2001 (Pearce 2005: 333). Pearce used religion as a control variable to isolate the role that religion played instead of just using the broad definition of identity conflicts which, makes it very difficult to determine the role that religion played. Pearce found that “when the relevance of religion to the conflict is incorporated to address the limits of identity-oriented definition of a religious conflict the relationship between the involvement of religion and conflict intensity weakens below an accepted level of significance"(ibid: 343 ). Conflict Transformation
History
The
end of the Cold War brought changes; the dismantling of the bipolar system of
order that had kept conflicts in Africa in check now led to a proliferation of
violent crises throughout the continent (Franke 2008:13). The world now changed
their attention from Africa to the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Track 1
diplomacy (‘official’ diplomacy) stopped far short of being inclusive enough of
a wide proportion of people that did not live in the Western world. Track 1 diplomacy
involves diplomats, heads of state, top level government officials and
international organisations, such as the UN. This realisation that Track 1 diplomacy
was ineffective alone in dealing with emerging conflicts led to Track 2
‘unofficial’ diplomacy growing in recognition. As Howard Coward and Gordon S
Smith state Track 1 diplomacy was just not enough (Coward, Smith eds 2004:
243).
Some governments have now begun to see the need to
train diplomats on religion because, as they have learnt in some parts of the
world, religion is integral to peoples’ being and not taking culture which
religion is a part of into account can result in negotiators being
conscious of the impact of culture when talks fail rather than when they
succeed (Cohen 1992: 18)
After 2001, the UN increasingly
saw the need for faith-based actors (UN 7th June 2001:147). The
key findings of the UN's 2007 Interreligious Dialogue was also clear. The UN
was still to play a central role in promoting a culture of peace, and faith-based
actors should contribute towards building that culture of peace, because they have a unique moral and spiritual
authority (UN 2007:III). Faith-based actors can also contribute towards
building peace alongside other non state actors that are engaged in divergent
forms of multi-track diplomacy.
Non-state actors also began to
realise that they could not just wait for the United Nations and the five
members, in particular, of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to assist
them and this led to an increase of non-state actors engaged in peace-building.
The African Union, a regional organisation, now recognises the importance of
engaging with religious leaders because of their influential power and how
religion is tightly woven into conceptions about identity in many traditional
countries (AU Interfaith forum declaration 2010). This therefore confirms that
there is a growing recognition that faith-based actors do play an important
part in building peace.
Theory The term conflict resolution, implies, that a conflict has been resolved and
that the nature of a conflict has changed into one that is no longer hostile or
violent. Conflict resolution can include arbitration, mediation and negation.
At the "deepest level of conflict resolution is a conflict transformation
approach"(Miall, Woodhouse 2005:8). Conflict transformation suggests that
there has been a deep change in the relationships of those involved in a
conflict and in the situation that led to that conflict.
Peace-building is the term most commonly used for post-conflict reconstruction
and reconciliation by individual actors or institutions/organisations and
inter- religious councils. Face based actors do receive most often training in
religious dispute management.
Lederach devised a Levels of Leadership pyramid that was based on Adam Curle’s
‘Making Peace'(Lederach 1995:12). At the top level tier (Level 1) are those
with high levels of visibility. These can include high profile religious
leaders, political or military officials. At Level 2 are those well respected
figures in the community and religious leaders can also operate at this level.
Level 3 is the grassroots level.
Faith based actor’s work can engage in working to reduce prejudice and other
grassroots peace-building in their communities. Faith-based actors working at
grassroots level peace-building and working in the community can act as voices
for those in their local community and pressure those higher up to implement
change- this is known as a bottoms-up approach. A peace-building from below
approach draws on resources from the local community to work towards trying to
bring about change, over the long-term, by laying down the building blocks and
foundations for peace.
Faith based actors can also have a top-down effect. What this means is that
those higher up at the Level 1 tier in (Lederach’s levels of Leadership
pyramid) are in a position to try to influence those in power that may able to
make changes. They may also have the contacts to do this. If these changes are
implemented, they will trickle down and, in some cases and potentially improve
the conditions of peoples’ lives.
Also, forgiveness, forgiveness can be defined as "the forswearing of
resentment, the resolute over-coming of anger and hatred that are naturally
directed towards a person who has done an unjustified non-excused moral
wrong" (Murphy, Jeffrey 1998:15) and reconciliation in conflict resolution
can be defined as “the restoring of broken relationships and learning to live
non-violently with radical differences” (Miall, Woodhouse 2005:231).
Forgiveness, reconciliation and repentance are deeply rooted in the Abrahamic
tradition but strongly accentuated in Christianity. Yehudith Auerbach argues
that forgiveness is a necessary though not sufficient condition for resolving
conflicts that are identity based (Auerbach 2005:469).
Reconciliation is the end goal of conflict transformation. Auerbach notes some
debate in conflict resolution as to whether reconciliation leads to forgiveness
and debate about if whether there is a casual link between forgiveness and
reconciliation and it is a contested area (Auerbach 2005:477). However, it can
be said that some faith-based actors can because, of their faith, develop a real
motivation in trying to get disputants to repent, forgive and reconcile as,
these requirements are explicitly stated in their religious texts and are their
norms as we saw in the TRC with Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
Forgiveness can lead to reconciliation in some cases; so it encourages the
restoration of ruptured relationships which is clearly advantageous in
peace-building. Forgiveness on its own is a positive end. Whether religious
leaders always achieve this is not in question here. These themes, forgiveness,
reconciliation and repentance can contribute to the transformation of conflicts
and building sustainable peace. Appleby states that religious actors are the
least vulnerable to treat reconciliation as managed or efficient (Appleby 2000:
195).
Faith based actors can also be involved in transnational justice and truth
commissions. Transnational justice is the transitioning of an undemocratic or
totalitarian rule to a democratic one and truth commissions are political
processes but as we saw with the South African TRC faith based actors can shape
the direction of Truth Commissions and this will become evidently clear through
my case study on the South African TRC.
Faith based actors can also be engaged in conflict resolution in various other
ways also. A religious leader’s position in the community can give them
credibility and legitimacy and they can use their position to influence those
in their community and bring clarity to disputes.
Religion can be used as a ‘soft’ power - this phrase was first used by Joseph
Nye. It essentially means that, through the power of persuasion and attractive
ideas, you can influence the actions of others (Haynes 2007:125). Hard Power
such a military intervention can only be used at best as a short term sticking plaster
as it is not a fix and especially not in the resolution of protracted
deep-rooted conflicts. Soft power can be used either directly or indirectly.
Religious leaders, in some communities because of their credibility and
influence that they hold, will be in a position to use this power
constructively or destructively. This soft power can give religious leaders a
unique leverage to resolve conflicts. In societies where religious leaders are
respected they are also in a position to try and get those in their community
to support peace processes and can therefore be good mobilisers for peace.
Also, some religious leaders will be critically engaged in a constant
re-visioning of their texts and drawing on those that promote peace. Ijtihad a
continuous evolving and interpretation of the Qur’an is just one tool that can
be used to interpret the Qu’ran in today's world. Scholars like Abu Nimer also
believe that within the Islamic tradition also that there exist practices that
support a conflict resolution approach. (Ramsbotham,Woodhouse, Miall 2005 pg
311).
Furthermore, the potential constructive universal message that religious
leaders can put over is unquestionable. Douglas Johnson makes clear that
faith-based actors can draw on a range of spiritual tools such as prayer,
rituals and scripture (Johnson 2003:16-17). We saw this quite clearly in the
South African TRC and I will discuss this in greater detail in my case study.
In some cases having a local faith-based actor, that may be indigenous to your
community may help to make some individuals to be more receptive. They may also
likely know the needs of their community and this is something that just cannot
be learnt in a book. These actors may also have a longer amount of time to
spend in an area can potentially put them in a more opportune position to
follow cases through.
Both soft and hard power approaches should be seen as complementary and we
should determine what the best steps to take are to ameliorate conflicts and
let that serve as a guide. As Krishan Berg Harpiken and Hanne Eggen Roislen
have argued "by virtue of the organization and normative system they
represent, religious authorities may have a credibility that it is difficult
for a nonreligious peace broker to acquire" (Harpviken, Roislen 2008
:365).
Appleby has stated that faith based actors are more likely to be successful
when they have an international or transnational reach, if they emphasise peace
avoidance over force and if they have good relationships with people from
different religions (Appleby 2000: 1-2).
Appleby has also stated that the interventionist mode, where faith- based
actors is invited to resolve conflicts are the most promising area for
faith-based actors (Appleby 2000: 239).
Of course, if faith-based actors are invited to mediate then it shows that
there is some willingness there to change and that their position is also
respected. And what may confound some is that Appleby also argues that
religious actors make the most impact when they remain religious actors and not
when they are moderating their faith (Appleby 2000:16). It is important to note
also as Johnson states that if there has been an impasse with Track 1 diplomacy
that we need to look at other avenues and sometimes a faith- based actor as I
have already demonstrated and as my case studies will demonstrate can help to
break that impasse.
Different countries may demand different styles of communication and
resolution. Communication matters and if you cannot communicate with people
effectively then the chances of success in any kind of negotiation will be very
slim. Raymond Cohen has pointed out that negotiators tend to be more conscious
of the impact of culture when talks fail then when they succeed (Cohen 1992 Pg
18). This is something that we should try to prevent. Also
attempting to ignore local cultures customs and norms fails in taking the
complexity of culture seriously and how it is internalised by some people.
Some traditional cultures are more emic (insider culture/member orientated
to resolve) in nature and Western approaches are more etic (more led by outside
observers who tend to prefer the
more “formal process” and “specialist role” and intervention through a
structured setting (Ausburger 1992 pg 37) to resolve these conflicts.
These approaches may be used to guide them.
Negotiators and mediators can draw on a repertoire of approaches according
to the need and subject matter. Direct communication which uses confrontation,
face to face negotiation, directness and frankness in stating demands are also
seen as prized in western conflict models. Indirect communication is used more
in traditional cultures which is often less direct in operation.
There are also high context and low context cultures which at times may need
different forms of communication tools to resolve conflict. China is a high context culture and there
form of communication style is typically more non verbal and based on shared
understanding and gestures such as
eye contact, facial expressions and the use of body language which may carry
significant weight in reaching effective communicating in this country.
Low context cultures prize more direct and specific verbal communication when
communicating. England is an example of a low context culture.
Orellana and Nimer (2008) have noted that lack of funds as an obstacle for
faith- based actors carrying out their work (Nimer, Orellana 2008:573). This is
a very valid point. In some traditional countries there is a lack of funds for
peace-building and faith based-actors will not be in a position to engage in
peace-building and conflict resolution. Chapter 3
Northern Ireland
Faith based actor’s faith can make them resolute and determined in their quest
for peace. In the Northern Ireland conflict although reaching the stage where
the Northern Ireland conflict is at now was clearly a collaborative effort
faith-based actors had a part to play in trying to resolve this conflict.
Reverend Roy Magee and Father Alex Reid, negotiated cease fires with the
paramilitaries in 1994 and that was a part of the process that led to the
signing of the Good Friday agreement in 1998 (Rte.ie 2nd February 2009) At
times they risked their lives because they were driven by their faith to find a
solution to this conflict (Little 2007:53). Father Alex Reid has also spoken
about how he saw the paramilitaries as regular people. He saw the humanity in
them and faith based actors because of their norms and values can them see the
humanity in all also because of their belief that we are all our
creators’children. Sant' Egidio: Guatamala
Sant' Egidio is a Catholic lay, international, NGO organisation that has had
recognised success, acting in the capacity of mediators in Mozambique, Algeria
and in Guatemala. They are a lay organisation and this means that their members
do not take any vows. It is clear to ascertain that their inspiration for their
work is motivated by their faith, through the clear references to their
motivations on their website:-
“It was through these kinds of experiences that Sant'Egidio's belief in the
"weak power" of prayer and in the transforming power of non-violence
and persuasion has been born. These are attitudes that Jesus Christ himself
lived to the end” (Sant’ Egidio website).
Sant' Egidio, played a part in the signing of the Guatemalan peace accord in
1996, that brought a formal end to the Guatemalan war that raged for thirty-six
years.
The Catholic Church in Guatemala acted as agents for change after their initial
support for anti- communist doctrines. The pressure from church officials also
had a part to play in the government forming a National Reconciliation
Commission (CNR) in 1989 (Accord 2002:40). This allowed civil society for the
first time to give a voice to their grievances. For more discussions on the
churches actions in Guatemala see (Calder 2001) (Jeffrey 1998).
The United Nations also played a role, acting as official negotiators.
However, in this case study I will analyse the role the Sant' Egidio
contributed and put their achievements in context to have a clear picture of
the role and impact that Sant' Egidio made.
The civil war in Guatemala started in 1962. Throughout this long embittered
war, there was a history of collapsed peace talks and setbacks. In 1995, Sant'
Egidio took the initiative and began unofficial, preliminary mediation talks
between government officials and the URNG officials in private. At a later
stage Alvaro Arzu, a candidate for the presidential elections, became
interested in the talks.
Sant' Egidio were also seen as a neutral party so this encouraged the
disputants to engage in the talks. Faith-based organisations can sometimes be
seen as a neutral and compassionate party so disputants might be inclined to
allow them to mediate-This happened with Sant' Edigio in Mozambique (Haynes
2009:64).
Sant' Egidio were able to reignite the peace talks but, it is important to
note, that the seeds for change were already there sown in society as talks had
been going on for years. Sant' Edigio though, clearly contributed to conflict
resolution. Both of these parties had never had face to face meetings before
and Sant' Edigio providing them with space and the time for trust to be built
that allowed them to air their grievances and allowed progress to be made.
In 1999 Sant' Edigio won the Felix-Houphouet-Boigny peace prize for their
mediation efforts. The Felix-Houphouet-Boigny award is an award that is awarded
by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation
(UNESCO) for recognised efforts “that have made a significant contribution to promoting,
seeking, safeguarding or maintaining peace” (UNESCO.org website). It was clear
in the press summary that Sant' Egidio’s mediation efforts were recognised in
Guatemala (UNESCO PRESS 2001).
Sant' Edigio’s role in Guatemala contributed towards resolving this conflict.
Although, the signing of the peace accord by no means ended all hostilities, it
did bring a formal end to the war that caused untold devastation for over
thirty years. Other actors also played a part in achieving these ends and that must
be recognised also. However, Sant’ Egdio’s position as faith-based actors gave
them a reputation as a neutral and compassionate party. They were able to break
an impasse in this conflict because of a commitment to peace and their
reputation. South Africa
In this case study, my focus is on the role that religious leaders played in
the TRC and also their impact on the TRC. I will also probe how the faith
community has responded to the TRC’s recommendations.
The TRC was the first of its kind to show the potential of how religious
language and leaders can be used at the level of public policy. In 1993 the
Interim Constitution laid down the legal framework for the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC) (Interim Constitution Act 2000 1993: 15).The TRC
was to be infused by the spirit of Unbuntu an African Xhosa tradition and the
end goal was to promote national unity and reconciliation.
The TRC was to be infused with a spirit of understanding and not vengeance. At
the heart of Unbuntu is the understanding that we are human through one
another. Truth Commissions are political processes and are a conflict
resolution mechanism. The TRC was an attempt to come to a broad consensus about
the past and build bridges for a new South Africa. The apartheid past fractured
and splintered South Africa, South Africa needed healing.
In 1985, 150 black and white theologians presented the Kairos document, which
was a sustained vilification of the apartheid system-the Kairos document made
clear that apartheid was a sin against God (Kairos Document 1985:4). This
served as a form of momentum in both the national and also international
communities who were already exerting pressure on the South African government
in the form of embargos and sporting restrictions.
In 1990, many churches in South Africa including the DRC, attended the
Rustenberg conference. A declaration was reached and this declaration stressed
a need for confession- this declaration was later given by Bishop Mogaba to
Nelson Mandela, who was still incarcerated on Robben Island( ibid:130). Mandela
himself also had a desire to see a reconciled South Africa. This was clearly
evident by his inauguration speech in 1994 in which he spoke about a need to
see a reconciled united South Africa (Speaking of faith website 1994).
I will focus on three of the TRC hearings the Institution hearings, the Amnesty
hearings and the Human Rights Violations (HRVC) hearings. The TRC opened in a
church and commissioners symbolically lit candles. Lyn Graybill states that
Tutu dressed in purple clerical robes, clearly acting as a religious figure
(Graybill 1998:46). Audrey Chapman and Bernard Spong argue “Without the input
of religious figures.....the lobbying and the activities of churches and other
NGOs did bring some fundamental key adaptations to the final legalisation”
(Chapman, Spong 2003:270). In the Institutions hearings the faith community and
other organisations and businesses in South Africa were confronted by their
implicitly in apartheid.
A clause in the National Promotion of Unity and Reconciliation Act granted full
amnesty for those perpetrators found guilty of gross human violations abuses if
they provided full disclosure and if there had been a political motivation
(Promotion of National Unity Act 34 1995:1). The TRC had the power to grant
amnesty (suspending criminal judgement on crimes) but not reparations (settlements) to the victims. With the mandate of
the Promotion of the National Unity Act and the fact that it was headed by
religious leaders this would colour the TRC proceedings.
The Amnesty hearings were where the perpetrators made confessions and this was
not conducted in religious ceremony. Claire Moon in her book titled "Narrating Political Reconcilation-South Africa's Reconcilation Comission" points out that for some perpetrators the
amnesty hearings were a performance and they appeared to be performing from a
script- jumping through hoops because they knew what they had to say to get
them amnesty (Moon 2008:99). Some victims’ and victims' families wanted actions
and not words and not for the perpetrators to be given amnesty. They believed
that the perpetrators deserved to feel the hand of justice. However, in the
TRC, justice was to be served in the form of restorative (correcting imbalances
and restoring past relationships) and not retributive (the emphasis is on
punishment of the wrongdoer ('Lex Talionis') justice. The TRC had no mandate to
criminally prosecute perpetrators if they complied with the procedure.
Perpetrators also did not need to show remorse. What was required was just full
disclosure.
The HRVC hearings were for victims to tell their stories. In the HRVC
hearings the most representative cases where heard from a collection of 22,000
statements that were taken (Shore 2009:66). In telling their stories, those who
suffered from gross violations of human rights abuses would be recommended for
reparations. The HRVC hearings were cloaked in religious language and were
punctuated by hymn singing and prayers (Graybill 1998:48). However, the use of
such religious ceremonies was seen as inappropriate by those who were not
Christian, and felt ostracised by the Christian overtones; there were also
objections from some black religious leaders who viewed this pursuit of
reconciliation as a form of ‘cheap’ reconciliation (Chapman, Spong
2003:288-290).
‘Cheap’ reconciliation is seen as the hijacking of Christian notions of
forgiveness -it was seen as necessary by those opposing 'Church theology'-to
first tackle the injustices in South Africa before discussions about
forgiveness could be entered into (Kairos document 1985: 11-12). The notion of
'Cheap' reconciliation is adapted from Dietrich Bonheoffer’s (1906-1945)
‘cheap’ grace. Tutu, in his book "No Future without Forgiveness",
makes it quite clear that he does not believe that you need to wait until
injustices are rooted out before you can start the reconciliation process (Tutu
1999: 220).
South Africa was largely a Christian country in the mid 1990s. 87% of the
population in 1996 were Christian (Shore: 2009:60).
Also, commissioners like Dr Fazel Randera objected at first to the religious
ceremony but then Randera changed his mind as they saw that the victims seemed
to get comfort by drawing on their faith during the victim hearings (Shore
2009: 71). Lyn Graybill argues that Christianity had played a large part in the
resistance struggle and support of apartheid that, it was a natural given, of
the demographics of South Africa that the TRC would have a Christian influence
(Graybill 1998:47). I agree with this argument.
Claire Moon argues these telling of stories for some victims were constrained
by the overarching organising telogical framework of reconciliation (Moon 2008:
115). Also, for victims to fully, heal, if they do will take time and this is
not something that we can expect to happen as a result of the TRC. For some the
TRC did make them feel worse straight after the hearings and this is not be
unexpected (Hayner 2002:144). However, there has appeared to be some cases
where victims or victims' families’ when followed up did appear to get some
form of reconciliation from the TRC. The mother of a woman murdered in the
Heidelberg Tavern Massacre refused to cooperate with the national prosecuting
authority when they tried to bring her case to trial as she was reconciled
(Cole 2010:123).
My main concern is how the TRC contributed to building a moral community.
National unity and reconciliation was the overarching aim of the TRC. Volume 1
of the TRC Final Report stated five different levels of reconciliation that
needed to be worked on- personal reconciliation, reconciliation between victim
and perpetrators, community reconciliation, national unity and reconciliation
and reconciliation and redistribution. (Volume 1 TRC Chapter 5:106-110). The
report however states that national unity was its overarching aim “The
overarching task assigned to the Commission by Parliament was the promotion of
national unity and reconciliation”.
The TRC did not directly lead to national reconciliation. Achieving
reconciliation is a longer term process and it will be a collaborative effort;
something that will need to be supported at all levels of society. It is
largely agreed upon that the TRC did though contribute to a transition from
apartheid to a more democratic inclusive form of government.
Also, many South Africans agreed that criminal trials could have led to civil
war (Chapman, Herwe 2008:196). Forgiveness and reconciliation in its Christian
prism will be a contentious issue especially when it is linked to perpetrators,
justice and amnesty. Would the TRC have made such an impact if it was not
cloaked in religious language and headed by religious leaders? Chapman and
Herwe argue that truth commissions are not appropriate vehicles for promoting
reconciliation and forgiveness, especially in a society with deep structural
divisions(Chapman, Herwe 2008: 277).
Shore argues that the Christian influence helped to shape the post-conflict
reconstruction stage of South Africa's transition through an emphasis on
truth-telling and reconciliation (Shore 2009:3). Russell Daye argues “it cannot
be questioned that many instances of individual victims or clusters forgiving
their tormentors were not facilitated by the TRC adding up these small dramas
amount to an advance in political forgiveness that will influence society as a
whole (Daye 2003:171).
The symbolic imagery and the emphasis on forgiveness had a crucial part to play
in the slow journey towards the healing of this political body. It was the
right approach to attempt to heal apartheid South Africa in 1996. Was it right
for Desmond Tutu to ask a few victims if they can forgive, or indirectly
pressuring them into? Did the TRC impede justice by focusing on having on
underlined Christian theme in the TRC HRVC hearings and therefore indirectly
link forgiveness with amnesty (Chapman, Spong 2003:274)?
The TRC process and more particularly the religious leaders contributed to
rebuilding South Africa, so I see the proceedings as justified. Furthermore, I
do agree with Fanie du Toit that the TRC was "designed to dramatically
invert apartheid’s social hierarchy, and ensure that perpetrators’ engagement
would restore the human and civic dignity of those who had suffered at their
hands attempt by a nascent society"(South African Reconciliation
Baraometer 2010:5 ). Chapman misses this point.
The religious input of the leaders helped to frame the questions and
discussions post TRC and it did so with the impact of a juggernaut crashing
into a city centre -it cannot be forgotten. This was also televised on national
television so it was also very difficult for people to ignore. It became the
benchmark and played an important part in laying down ethical and moral
concerns, such as truth, forgiveness, reconciliation and human dignity.
In 2000 81% of black South Africans surveyed in a Institute for Justice and
Reconciliation survey responded that national reconciliation will only take
place if people forgive each other (Chapman, Herwe 2008:208). This figure was
at 61% for white South Africans. A considerable majority of respondents also
stated that the national reconciliation requires the healing of memories.
These principles can support the emergence of a human rights culture and the
building of a stable democracy if the proper structures are put in place. Today
questions are still asked about forgiveness and reconciliation in South Africa.
The religious leaders left a long lasting legacy.
As been stated Nelson Mandela’s vision for South Africa also played a part in
this process. The economy was also in a downturn and people wanted changes. The
TRC and more in particular the religious leaders provided a solid backbone
grounded in moral principles. I do see the TRC as a mechanism that was needed
to attempt to restore broken relationships.The TRC was by no means a perfect
process, the budget although it was the most that a TRC had ever had it was not
enough. Also, high profile figures not taking part did not help either. The
commissioner’s hands were also tied by the mandate and they did not have the
power to grant repatriations.
We cannot ignore the victims. It is rough justice that some victims have not
been able to get the reparations that they were promised which for some has not
allowed them to close the door on the TRC.
Most truth commissions are one off's but this does not mean that valuable
lessons cannot be learnt from other truth commissions. Truth commissions get
inspiration from other truth commissions but they should adapt what will work
to their own country. In East Timor for example local traditions were used to
integrate the perpetrators back into the community. In South Africa settlement
was negotiated but in Chile for example they were transitioning from a
dictatorship and outcomes were different. More Truth Comissions have followed
after the South African TRC.
What has been the impact of the TRC
and have the recommendations been followed through? The fifth Truth
Reconciliation Volume laid out the recommendations for the faith community (TRC
Volume 5 33:36).
The victims many were promised reparations and
that has not materialised and what has appeared to be for some was just token gestures (Sacramone-Lutz 2010:9). Victims have taken up some initiatives and one
of them was the creation of a support group called the Khulumani support group. This support group sought to
prosecute multinational corporations that they felt had been implicit in
apartheid. Desmond Tutu also gave his backing for this case (Moon 2008:152).
Several churches also supported the
Khulmani support case which ceased in 2007.
In South Africa the Quaker Peace
Centre were also engaged in grassroots peace-building.
Another one of the faith inativites
and legacy was the creation in 2005 of a Healing and Reconciliation project
called transcending racism by SACC.
Some of the faith community
had to come to terms with their own past that they played implicitly in apartheid
and they needed to try to rebuild bridges with those in their community.
The latest South African
Reconciliation 2009 barometer polls shows that the church is the most trusted
body in South Africa by quite some margin rating at 71% and they should be more
involved in peace-building as they have a lot of moral influence (South Africa Reconciliation
Barometer 2009:10).
It is clear in the
South African TRC that churches, religious leaders and organisations had a part
to play in rebooting South Africa with moral software. Some churches during
apartheid acted as agents of change. There needed to be more of a concerted
effort from businesses and government in helping to deal with the structural
problems in South Africa. Race relations have improved in South Africa but of
course that cannot be all directly be contributed to the TRC, but the TRC
provided a solid foundation (South African Reconciliation Barometer 2009:10).
It is a collaborative effort that will lead to changes and faith based actors
should be engaged in this effort. Reconciliation is a long term process and the
reconciliation process will need to be supported as a group effort at all
levels of society. Sierra Leone
In Sierra Leone the inter-religious council was an active broker that played a
major part in the Lome Accord being signed.
Uganda
Betty used Christian principles such as reconciliation and a striving for peace
to guide her work and nurture her passion. Betty Oyella-Bigombe has been
credited for bringing representatives of the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda
to meet with members of the Ugandan government for the first time. During these
negotiations Bigombe also facilitated as a chief mediator and she had these
talks named after her. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Branka
Peuraca conducted a study in 2001-2002 in Bosnia Herzegovina. Peuraca was
commissioned by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) to investigate if
whether faith based non-governmental advisors (NGO’s) can advance interfaith
reconciliation. Peuraca’s objective in this study was to assess the role that
faith based (NGO’s) have had in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In Peuraca’s study she
found that faith based NGO’s did have a role to play in conflict mediation and
prevention (Peuraca 2003:11). Summary
With Christianity an eye for an eye ‘Lex Talions” ended with the birth of Jesus
Christ. We are not expected now to seek revenge on wrongdoing but are expected
to forgive our enemy if they ask for forgiveness and if they are repentant.
We are also expected to reconcile those that have grieved us. It’s principles
are set out in Matthew (5:38-44).
We are told that God will seek revenge for us in his own time.
We can though use the law of the land and seek justice through the courts just
the same as everyone else and use the Old Testament as an example of respecting
the law of the land.
We are though expected to protect our Temples which reside in us and Jesus
himself drove out the money lenders from selling in front of the Temple. You
can treat them in the manner and Spirit that Jesus treated them as well in good
judgment and in a most compassionate proportinate way that is just. Key Christian Principles
"To respond to human need by loving service"
" To seek to transform unjust structures of society to challenge violence
of every kind and to pursue peace and reconciliation" Conclusion It is clear that faith-based actors can contribute to the resolution of
conflicts and play an important factor in some countries in resolving
conflicts. This needs now to be broadly accepted that religion can be used as a
force for peace.
All religions have the potential to be drawn on and used constructively-it is
time to remove Western lenses. Building peace is a collective effort and
faith-based actors have a role to play in this effort. It is now time to give
attention the other side of religion and that as intellectually honest scholars
we must recognise that religion has at times the capacity to be used
constructively to resolve and prevent conflicts. Faith based actors need
support to continue their work. Not supporting their work could potentially
result in increased conflicts.
Let us use these peace transforming conflict resolution skills and tools in our
everyday management of dispute mediation.